Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.4.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen1.5-7B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.