Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 32.2.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1090 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1117 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1064 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1045 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1056 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1070 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1053 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.