Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

66.8

Rank #5 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) Google

35.1

Rank #228 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 15.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 89.2% for Claude Fable 5 and 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).

Side by side

Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) specifications
Claude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index66.835.1
Released2026-06-072024-12-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked6254

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
WeirdML91.9%25.8%
LMArena Coding15191350
DeepSWE69.9%—
FrontierCode53.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—13.5%
Aider Polyglot—38.2%
LMArena WebDev1625—
FrontierSWE47%—
SciCode61%—
GSO78.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.9%
LiveBench Coding—63.4%
MirrorCode63.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete—59.9%
CadEval—30%
ALE-Bench2,041—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
APEX-Agents63.6%—
Remote Labor Index16.1%—
TheAgentCompany—11.4%
τ²-bench Banking39.7%—
PostTrainBench41.8%—
GBAEval74.5%—
GDP.pdf30%—
LMArena Search1230—
Vending-Bench 25,680—

Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
ARC-AGI-289.2%1.3%
SimpleBench81.9%31.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%37.8%
EnigmaEval39.3%1.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts15081346
DTBench98.4%63.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index162.06135.36
NYT Connections (extended)92.7%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt28.6%—
Chess Puzzles41%—
EBR-Bench39.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—78.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles52%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—69.4%
LMCA61.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Bench to the Future 30.13—
LiveBench—66.9%

Math Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%57.8%
LMArena Math15191352
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87%—
FrontierMath Tier 490.2%—
ProofBench95%—
Omni-MATH—45.9%
LiveBench Math—75.8%
MATH Level 5—82.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%
FrontierMath Erdős0%—

Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
GPQA Diamond85.9%64.1%
LMArena Expert15341339
Humanity's Last Exam—6.6%
SimpleQA Verified70.7%—
MMLU-Pro—73.7%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—55.6%
MMLU—79.7%

Multimodal Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Vision13241158
GeoBench—77%
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly35.8%—
LMArena Document1496—

Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Non-English14811342
LMArena Chinese15431373
LMArena French15051391
LMArena German14861353
LMArena Japanese15061294
LMArena Korean14881313
LMArena Russian15041351
LMArena Spanish14981363

Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following15021336
LiveBench Instruction Following—85.8%
IFEval—84.1%

Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Longer Query15091344
Fiction.LiveBench—61.1%

Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Text14911354
LMArena Creative Writing14941340
EQ-Bench Creative Writing19431128
LMArena Multi-Turn15041350
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.8%
WildBench—80%
EQ-Bench 41340—
LiveBench Language—51.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 62 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper