Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#223); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than GPT-6.1 Sol?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#223); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and GPT-6.1 Sol share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.