Model comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 90.4% for Claude Opus 5 and 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 67.8 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-24 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | — |
| Results tracked | 57 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 91.8% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1350 |
| DeepSWE | 73.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| CursorBench | 46.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1691 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 52% | — |
| SciCode | 56.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| ALE-Bench | 2,165 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.8% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 31.4% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 48.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 35% | — |
| BALROG | 63.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 79.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 24% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 11,182 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.4% | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | 31.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 97.9% | 63.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.78 | 135.36 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 29.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 42% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| EBR-Bench | 45.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 59% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| LMCA | 64.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.12 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1531 | 1352 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 85.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 73.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 64.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1557 | 1339 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |
Multimodal Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 30.4% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1516 | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1501 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1574 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1519 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1524 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1516 | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | 1521 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1519 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1515 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1507 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1491 | 1340 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2133 | 1128 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.