Model comparison
Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 10.7.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1314 |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1213 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1204 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.