Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Wizardlm 70b

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 13.9.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.332.4
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding12641081
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts12461079
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math12731116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English12581078
LMArena Chinese12481052
LMArena German12581083
LMArena Russian12801155
LMArena French1274—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following12481093
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query12591097

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text12621120
LMArena Creative Writing12351149
LMArena Multi-Turn12751108
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper