Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 2 2b IT

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 14.8.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 2 2b IT specifications
Claude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.533.1
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Coding12641112
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts12451113
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Math12731135
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Expert12231096
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Non-English12581121
LMArena Chinese12481132
LMArena French12751157
LMArena German12581114
LMArena Japanese12041083
LMArena Korean11871055
LMArena Russian12801118
LMArena Spanish12461140

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following12481118
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query12591130

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Text12621156
LMArena Creative Writing12351147
LMArena Multi-Turn12751118
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (32.9 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper