Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 24.5.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Claude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderAnthropicIBM
Noometry Index29.541.8
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4611

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding12641396
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts12451374
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert12231406
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English12581340
LMArena Chinese12481414
LMArena Russian12801343
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following12481347
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query12591359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text12621361
LMArena Creative Writing12351288
LMArena Multi-Turn12751339
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper