Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.6% for Claude 3 Opus and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.545.2
Released2024-02-292026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding12641503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—899.8
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12451488
DTBench61.6%84.5%
LMCA17%29.5%
SimpleBench23.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math12731481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
ProofBench—22%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert12231503
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English12581449
LMArena Chinese12481507
LMArena French12751488
LMArena German12581458
LMArena Japanese12041412
LMArena Korean11871437
LMArena Russian12801450
LMArena Spanish12461471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12481477
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12591483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text12621465
LMArena Creative Writing12351440
LMArena Multi-Turn12751477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper