Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 14.8.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Hy4 preview specifications
Claude 3 OpusHy4 preview
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index29.545.3
Released2024-02-292026-08-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.83
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LMArena WebDev—1632
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Hy4 preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
SimpleBench23.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Hy4 preview leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
ProofBench—75%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Hy4 preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusHy4 preview
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper