Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs ERNIE 5.1

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 14.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index29.543.8
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Coding12641488
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), ERNIE 5.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
Cybench10%—
LMArena Search—1227
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12451481
SimpleBench23.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—23.4%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Math12731481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Expert12231492
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), ERNIE 5.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Non-English12581454
LMArena Chinese12481508
LMArena French12751488
LMArena German12581470
LMArena Japanese12041422
LMArena Korean11871427
LMArena Russian12801459
LMArena Spanish12461473

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Instruction Following12481460
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Longer Query12591462

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusERNIE 5.1
LMArena Text12621468
LMArena Creative Writing12351441
LMArena Multi-Turn12751471
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and ERNIE 5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper