Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 36.6 to 13.9.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1440 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1451 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1422 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1439 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1432 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.