Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

44.7

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 29.8.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.744.7
Released2024-03-07—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding11991488
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11741483
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math11881473
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert11481489
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English11781465
LMArena Chinese11551534
LMArena French11941483
LMArena German11741487
LMArena Japanese11021497
LMArena Korean11081438
LMArena Russian12041472
LMArena Spanish11651470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11741467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query11911477

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text11951471
LMArena Creative Writing11571464
LMArena Multi-Turn11901478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper