Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen1.5-110B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Anthropic

39.5

Rank #164 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 54.4 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.534.2
Released2025-02-242024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked5820

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding13611184
SWE-bench Verified61%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)52.8%—
Aider Polyglot64.9%—
GSO3.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LiveBench Coding74.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
CadEval54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
TheAgentCompany30.9%—
Cybench20%—
DeepResearch Bench43.6%—
OSWorld35.8%—
METR Time Horizons60%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13331168
ForecastBench61.857.7
ARC-AGI-20.9%—
SimpleBench46.4%—
ARC-AGI-128.6%—
EnigmaEval4.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning87.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis74%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.16—
LiveBench76.1%—

Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math13371185
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202557.8%—
Omni-MATH33%—
LiveBench Math79%—
MATH Level 591.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.1%—

Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert13211144
GPQA Diamond79.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
MMLU-Pro78.4%—
Confabulations14.7%—
GPQA (HELM)60.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1169—
GeoBench68%—
VPCT39%—
SpatialViz-Bench33.9%—

Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English12961142
LMArena Chinese12991206
LMArena French13031151
LMArena German13011123
LMArena Japanese12671074
LMArena Korean12491044
LMArena Russian13111118
LMArena Spanish12981142

Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13521158
LiveBench Instruction Following81.3%—
IFEval83.4%—

Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13731157
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 SonnetQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13141175
LMArena Creative Writing13321148
LMArena Multi-Turn13391160
Short-Story Creative Writing81.1%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1412—
WildBench81.4%—
LiveBench Language59.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper