Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Devstral Small 2505
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Devstral Small 2505 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Devstral Small 2505 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 33.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-05-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 41.1 (#120), Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | 56.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 28.8% |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.9 (#46), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.7 (#252), Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 35.7 (#137), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1336 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.7 (#117), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.1 (#90), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.3 (#174), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1299 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 73.1 (#120), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.2 (#10), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.6 (#145), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Devstral Small 2505?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Devstral Small 2505 better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Devstral Small 2505 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Devstral Small 2505 has 4.