Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1-mini
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 36 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 36 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 40.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 64.9% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 32.9% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 32.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | 48% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1362 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 20% | 10% |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | 72.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | 57.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | 62% |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 1.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | 18.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1316 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1303 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | 65.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1304 |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1320 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1244 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | 64.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | 40.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than o1-mini?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or o1-mini better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and o1-mini share?
36 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.