Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.5
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 41 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 41 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4.5 in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 40.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 64.9% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 44.9% for GPT-4.5.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-02-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.5 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 44.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | 75.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1396 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 39.4% |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 20% | 17.5% |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | 34.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | 10.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | 64.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 136.74 |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | 61.7 |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | 69% |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 37.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | 69.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1412 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 78.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 68.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | 5.4% |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | 13.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1394 |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal GPT-4.5 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | 1195 |
| VPCT | 39% | 45% |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1421 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | 72.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1404 |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 63.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1406 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1394 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | 75.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | 1258 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1444 |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | 61.5% |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than GPT-4.5?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.5 share?
41 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.