Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.2 to 37.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 60.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 38.3% for Granite 4.0 H Small.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 41.1 (#120), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1247 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.9 (#46), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.7 (#252), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1240 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 35.7 (#137), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 33% | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1336 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.7 (#117), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | 56.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1244 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.1 (#90), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.3 (#174), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1299 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 73.1 (#120), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.4% | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1221 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.2 (#10), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1240 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.6 (#145), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1210 |
| WildBench | 81.4% | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1243 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.