Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Command A
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Command A in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 40.6 to 27.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 64.9% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 12% for Command A.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-03-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Command A: 27.2 (#322)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 12% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1330 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Command A: 35.9 (#40)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 57.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Command A: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1326 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| LMCA | — | 10.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Command A: 36.2 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1300 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Command A: 37.1 (#159)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Command A: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Command A: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1351 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1285 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1347 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Command A: 69.1 (#177)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1309 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Command A: 40.6 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1334 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Command A: 47.6 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1331 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1319 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | 1145 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Command A?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Command A better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Command A share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.