Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 31.5.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 39.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.