Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen Turbo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 28.6 to 22.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 55.3% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 41.8% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 56.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Qwen Turbo?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.