Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Olmo 7b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

30.3

Rank #295 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Haiku leads 42.7 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.230.3
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12861016
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1251993
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12441018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1238977
LMArena Chinese12291014
LMArena Russian1253947
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1241978
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12551032
LMArena Creative Writing1233990
LMArena Multi-Turn12651007
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper