Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen1.5-32B

Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 33.0 to 14.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 42% for Qwen1.5-32B.
  • Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.230.5
Released2024-10-222024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%32.3%
LMArena Coding12861155
BigCodeBench Complete59%42%
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12511130
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-32B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math12441155
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond38.1%30.7%
LMArena Expert12081126
MMLU74.3%74.4%
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen1.5-32B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English12381106
LMArena Chinese12291177
LMArena French12641101
LMArena German12371058
LMArena Japanese11751027
LMArena Korean11731008
LMArena Russian12531073
LMArena Spanish12611089

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12411116
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query12611146

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text12551137
LMArena Creative Writing12331083
LMArena Multi-Turn12651140
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen1.5-32B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper