Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1016 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 993 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 947 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.1 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.