Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 13.7.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 52.2 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 49 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 155.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | — |
| MMLU | 74.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | — |
| LMArena French | 1262 | — |
| LMArena German | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.