Model comparison
DBRX vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 24.3.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.