Model comparison

GPT-4 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.3

Rank #39 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 10.8.
  • GPT-4 is cheaper at $30 / $60 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
  • GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

GPT-4 and GPT-5.2 Pro specifications
GPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Noometry Index29.152.3
Released2023-03-142025-12-11
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window8K400K
Max output8K128K
Input $ / M tokens$30$21
Output $ / M tokens$60$168
Results tracked388

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
LMArena Coding1254—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89155.4
ARC-AGI-2—54.2%
SimpleBench—57.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.3%
ARC-AGI-1—90.5%
Chess Puzzles4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1241—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math1269—
MATH Level 523%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—31.3%
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Non-English1246—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1251—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1244—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Text1263—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—
LMArena Multi-Turn1257—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-4 is cheaper. It lists at $30 per million input tokens and $60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper