Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-5.2 Codex

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

28.9

Rank #309 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.2

Rank #107 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 40.7 to 27.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Codex specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index28.942.2
Released2024-10-222025-12-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.75
Output $ / M tokens—$14
Results tracked495

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.4 (#66)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1339
SWE-bench Multilingual—66.3%
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
ALE-Bench—1,300

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.2 Codex leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), GPT-5.2 Codex: 40.7 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
Terminal-Bench—66.5%
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1262—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1172—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), GPT-5.2 Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGPT-5.2 Codex
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than GPT-5.2 Codex?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.4 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-5.2 Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper