Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 27.9.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Codex and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
GPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.629.3
Released2025-12-182024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SWE-bench Multilingual66.3%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
LMArena Coding—1101
ALE-Bench1,300—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Terminal-Bench66.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1100
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Math—17.6%
LMArena Math—1151

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1087

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text—1110
LMArena Creative Writing—1083
LMArena Multi-Turn—1068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper