Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 43.2 to 18.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 84.4% for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.242.5
Released2024-10-222026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked4932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding12861412
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1244
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
BALROG19.3%—
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12511403
DTBench56.7%82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15143.98
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—21%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
LMCA—29.1%
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%84.4%
LMArena Math12441407
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%6.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
GPQA Diamond38.1%82.3%
LMArena Expert12081407
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English12381385
LMArena Chinese12291446
LMArena French12641412
LMArena German12371390
LMArena Japanese11751368
LMArena Korean11731344
LMArena Russian12531379
LMArena Spanish12611400

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12411374
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12611392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text12551397
LMArena Creative Writing12331343
LMArena Multi-Turn12651393
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper