Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 32.0 to 14.7.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.231.3
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding12861084
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
HumanEval+—35.4%
MBPP+—45%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts12511071
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math12441107
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert12081039
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English12381052
LMArena Chinese12291061
LMArena French12641065
LMArena German12371054
LMArena Japanese1175971
LMArena Korean1173988
LMArena Russian12531046
LMArena Spanish12611049

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following12411057
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query12611056

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text12551094
LMArena Creative Writing12331060
LMArena Multi-Turn12651040
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper