Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Falcon-180B leads 29.1 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |
Instruction Following Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 992 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.