Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen Max
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 16.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 67.2% for Qwen Max.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Qwen Max leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 67.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Qwen Max leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen Max share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.