Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 41.8 to 7.8.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.545.3
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding11521487
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11331483
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math11511474
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert11131489
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English10981465
LMArena Chinese10761534
LMArena French11591484
LMArena German11041487
LMArena Japanese9671495
LMArena Korean10041438
LMArena Russian11091471
LMArena Spanish11731470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11271467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query11281476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text11661470
LMArena Creative Writing11501464
LMArena Multi-Turn11521478

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper