Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 30.4 to 9.3.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.