Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 30.4 to 10.2.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.