Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.5 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51.9% for Claude 2 and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 154.21 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1483 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1485 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.