Model comparison

Claude 2 vs GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

GPT-5 Nano OpenAI

33.5

Rank #241 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5 Nano in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 Nano leads 29.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 95.2% for GPT-5 Nano.

Side by side

Claude 2 and GPT-5 Nano specifications
Claude 2GPT-5 Nano
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.033.5
Released2023-07-112025-08-07
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked849

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—34.8%
WeirdML—38.1%
LMArena Coding—1351
ALE-Bench—718.67
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
Terminal-Bench—21.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—51.5%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
DTBench51.9%62.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13139.38
ARC-AGI-2—2.6%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.2%
ARC-AGI-1—20.7%
Chess Puzzles—27%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1328
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
LMCA—7.9%
ForecastBench—59.1

Math GPT-5 Nano leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%81.1%
MATH Level 511.7%95.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—20%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
ProofBench—12%
Omni-MATH—54.6%
LMArena Math—1317
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GPT-5 Nano leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
GPQA Diamond34.7%69.4%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
MMLU-Pro—77.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
GPQA (HELM)—67.9%
LMArena Expert—1321
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Vision—1159
VPCT—37.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Non-English—1313
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena German—1327
LMArena Japanese—1226
LMArena Korean—1269
LMArena Russian—1296
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
IFEval—93.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1306

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
Fiction.LiveBench—44.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1312

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Text—1320
LMArena Creative Writing—1249
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—705
WildBench—80.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1311

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than GPT-5 Nano?

GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and GPT-5 Nano share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper