Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs GPT-5 Nano
GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5 Nano in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Nano leads 35.8 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 81.1% for GPT-5 Nano.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Nano leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), GPT-5 Nano: 33.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | 38.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 34.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1351 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 718.67 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 25.6 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), GPT-5 Nano: 16.4 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 62.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | 139.39 |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | 59.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 27% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1329 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.9% |
Math GPT-5 Nano leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), GPT-5 Nano: 29.1 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 81.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| ProofBench | — | 12% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Nano leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), GPT-5 Nano: 35.8 (#166)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 69.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1321 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 30.7 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1159 |
| VPCT | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 45.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1355 |
| LMArena German | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1296 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 75.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1306 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1313 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5 Nano: 39.4 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-5 Nano?
GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-5 Nano share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 48.