Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 29.8 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 63.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).

Side by side

Claude 2 and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
Claude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index25.033.7
Released2023-07-112024-08-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked834

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
WeirdML—22.2%
LiveBench Coding—46.4%
LMArena Coding—1287
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
DTBench51.9%65.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13130.48
SimpleBench—22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1272
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%11.5%
MATH Level 511.7%63.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPQA Diamond34.7%53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%
LMArena Expert—1254
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English—1282
LMArena Chinese—1289
LMArena French—1318
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1270

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query—1276

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text—1305
LMArena Creative Writing—1284
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1290
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper