Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 9.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1284 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1255 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.