Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 7.0.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1268 |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1255 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.