Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) Google

33.2

Rank #246 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads 22.1 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 61.9% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024).

Side by side

Claude 2 and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) specifications
Claude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index25.033.2
Released2023-07-112024-05-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked842

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
HumanEval+61.6%75.6%
WeirdML—24.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.5%
LMArena Coding—1261
BigCodeBench Complete—55.1%
MBPP+—67.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
BALROG—14.6%

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
DTBench51.9%53.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13129.36
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
ForecastBench—53.9
PIQA—87.5%

Math Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%16.3%
MATH Level 511.7%61.9%
Omni-MATH—30.4%
LMArena Math—1269
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%
GSM8K—82.4%

Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
GPQA Diamond34.7%47.3%
MMLU78.5%77.9%
MMLU-Pro—67.8%
GPQA (HELM)—43.7%
LMArena Expert—1233
BoolQ—85.8%
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Vision—1141
Video-MME—70.3%
GeoBench—76%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Non-English—1278
LMArena Chinese—1295
LMArena French—1258
LMArena German—1262
LMArena Japanese—1252
LMArena Korean—1221
LMArena Russian—1288
LMArena Spanish—1243

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
IFEval—83.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1258

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Longer Query—1284

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)
LMArena Text—1287
LMArena Creative Writing—1285
WildBench—79.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1253

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024)?

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper