Model comparison

Claude 2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 66.7 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 98.3% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
Claude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index25.052.8
Released2023-07-112026-09-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked837

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev—1619
SciCode—51.9%
LMArena Coding—1506
ALE-Bench—1,092
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
APEX-Agents—39.5%
GDP.pdf—19.8%

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench51.9%89.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13154.9
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
CritPt—14.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—43%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%98.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—67.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
ProofBench—54%
LMArena Math—1477
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond34.7%89.8%
LMArena Expert—1506
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision—1277
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1448
LMArena Chinese—1497
LMArena French—1452
LMArena German—1484
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1452
LMArena Russian—1471
LMArena Spanish—1459

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1474

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1475

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text—1462
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1540
LMArena Multi-Turn—1457

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper