Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 10.2.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.