Model comparison
GPT-4o mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4o mini scores higher in 1 category and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 43.1% for GPT-4o mini and 10.4% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.4 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2024-07-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
GPT-4o mini: 21.6 (#330), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 43.1% | 10.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 3.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 11.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1290 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 83.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 72.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 27.2 (#95), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 17.4% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#343), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.8% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 50% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 41.3% | 22.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 10.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 54.4% | — |
| LMCA | 10.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.56 | — |
| PIQA | 88.7% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
GPT-4o mini: 9.9 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 28% | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 36.3% | 13.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1267 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 52.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 91.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#279), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 60.3% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.8% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 37.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 37.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1235 | — |
| BoolQ | 88.7% | — |
| MMLU | 81.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 25.3 (#117), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1066 | — |
| Video-MME | 64.8% | — |
| GeoBench | 64% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 42.2 (#194), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1264 | — |
| LMArena French | 1296 | — |
| LMArena German | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1276 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4o mini leads
GPT-4o mini: 62.1 (#234), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 56.8% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | 78.2% | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1259 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#181), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1289 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
GPT-4o mini: 39.7 (#243), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 79.1% | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | 28.6% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1268 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 67.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 873 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1285 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4o mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4o mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.1 versus 21.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4o mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.