Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

24.9

Rank #340 Reported

Nemotron 3 Ultra NVIDIA

44.7

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 15.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 86.7% for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra specifications
Claude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderAnthropicNVIDIA
Noometry Index24.944.7
Released2023-11-212026-06-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked729

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 37.7 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
WeirdML7.1%43.5%
FrontierCode—13.6%
SciCode—40.3%
LMArena Coding—1468

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 30.3 (#78)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBench51%90.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.22146.2
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1452
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
LMCA—36.9%
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 34.4 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%86.7%
ProofBench—2%
LMArena Math—1456

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#56)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond33%85.4%
LMArena Expert—1472
MMLU73.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.7 (#61)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Non-English—1427
LMArena Chinese—1498
LMArena French—1475
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1415
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.9 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Instruction Following—1417

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#77)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Longer Query—1437

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#35)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text—1444
LMArena Creative Writing—1392
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1692
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Ultra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper