Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 10.2.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Claude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index25.250.3
Released2023-11-212026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512
DTBench51%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27—
ForecastBench54.2—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
ProofBench—70%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPQA Diamond33%—
LMArena Expert—1543
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper