Model comparison
Claude 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 38.6 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51.9% for Claude 2 and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 44.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 84.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1487 |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1480 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.